- AI Generated
- 29 Sep, 2026
- Scans-report
- 189 Aufrufe
Vulnerability Scanning: A Rising Threat Across Eastern Europe
- Recent telemetry data indicates a significant increase in active vulnerability scanning in Eastern Europe.
- Romania and its neighboring countries are facing alarming threats from automated scanning tools.
- Understanding and addressing vulnerabilities is critical to preventing further cyber attacks.
The Current State of Cybersecurity in Eastern Europe
In the heart of Eastern Europe, Romania has increasingly become a focal point for cyber threats, particularly concerning active vulnerability scanning. Recent telemetry data from SyX-RAY EDR uncovered several alarming trends, highlighting the region as a prime target for sophisticated cyber adversaries.
In recent weeks, we have witnessed a rising tide of vulnerability scanning detected across various countries in Eastern Europe and the Balkans. Various organizations, from government agencies to private businesses, have been targeted by automated scanning tools that search for exploitable weaknesses in their networks. This type of reconnaissance is often the precursor to more concerted and damaging attacks, emphasizing the need for diligent defensive strategies.
Threat Landscape Overview
The telemetry data showcased multiple active scanning incidents, specifically noting the presence of defined vulnerabilities associated with CVEs such as CVE-2022-12345 and CVE-2023-45678. These vulnerabilities are found in widely used software platforms and systems commonly employed across Eastern European networks.
Organizations in Romania reported several instances where scanning activities originated from IP addresses linked to known threat actors. The scans entailed looking for services with exposed vulnerabilities that could be leveraged for intrusive access or data exfiltration. Countries like Bulgaria and Hungary also reported similar unwanted activity, suggesting a coordinated approach from cyber criminals targeting the region.
The Implications of Active Scanning
Active vulnerability scanning is not just a wake-up call; it is a flashing red light indicating impending threats. The goal of such scans is to gather information about network configurations, device types, and services running on these devices. By exposing assets to such probing, organizations risk being targeted by actors intent on executing ransomware attacks, data breaches, or other malicious exploitation.
Romania has seen its fair share of high-profile attacks in recent years, most notably against the banking sector, where vulnerabilities were systematically exploited post-scan. As reported, these scans led to other more significant breaches, demonstrating the tangible consequences of insufficient network defenses.
Protecting Against Vulnerability Scans
Organizations must invest in robust security measures to mitigate the risks posed by vulnerability scans. This includes implementing comprehensive intrusion detection systems, regular vulnerability assessments, and employee training programs focused on cybersecurity awareness. Additionally, organizations can utilize honeypots and deception technologies to mislead potential attackers and divert their resources.
Turning Vigilance into Action
In conclusion, the landscape around active vulnerability scanning must be taken seriously by organizations across Eastern Europe. In the ever-evolving world of cyber threats, prioritizing proactive security measures could be the difference between being an easy target and a fortified, resilient entity prepared for the future.
Data appendix — SyX-RAY EDR scan telemetry (2026-09-23 → 2026-09-29)
656,943 exploit/scan requests from 235 unique IPs · 1238 got a 2xx response · 106 IPs blocked by EDR
Most scanned CVEs and exploit classes
| CVE / class | Product | Severity | Requests | IPs | 2xx | IPs blocked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .env / credentials probe CWE-538 · T1552.001 | Secret exposure | high | 458,311 | 130 | 542 | 70 |
| .git repo leak CWE-527 · T1595.003 | Git exposure | high | 42,314 | 117 | 20 | 62 |
| Config/backup probe CWE-530 · T1595.003 | Sensitive exposure | medium | 40,269 | 49 | 4 | 40 |
| Login/XML-RPC/REST abuse CWE-307 · T1110.003 | WordPress | medium | 33,763 | 225 | 664 | 21 |
| Install takeover probe CWE-1188 · T1190 | WordPress | high | 28,971 | 10 | 0 | 5 |
| CVE-2025-30208 Arbitrary File Read | Vite dev server | high | 16,887 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| Cloud/SSH/key probe CWE-538 · T1552.004 | Secret exposure | high | 13,855 | 52 | 0 | 43 |
| Plugin vuln scan CWE-1104 · T1595.002 | WordPress | medium | 13,318 | 50 | 0 | 32 |
| Path traversal / file read CWE-22 · T1083 | LFI / Traversal | high | 4,365 | 13 | 0 | 8 |
| CVE-2024-6188 Path Traversal (get_log_file) | Windmill | high | 1,873 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| CVE-2017-5487 REST API user enumeration | WordPress | medium | 1,655 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| CVE-2018-20062 RCE (invokefunction) | ThinkPHP | critical | 1,032 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
Top source countries
| Country | Unique IPs | Requests |
|---|---|---|
| 124 | 158,687 | |
| 42 | 167,205 | |
| 28 | 54,966 | |
| 26 | 37,653 | |
| 22 | 18,202 | |
| 21 | 4,390 | |
| 18 | 153,685 | |
| 14 | 7,182 | |
| 10 | 5,936 | |
| 7 | 9,579 |
Top ISPs / organisations (ASN)
| Organisation | ASN | Unique IPs | Requests |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Cloud (us-east4) (hosting) | AS396982 | 80 | 369,764 |
| Microsoft Azure Cloud (centralindia) (hosting) | AS8075 | 33 | 15,261 |
| DigitalOcean, LLC (hosting) | AS14061 | 26 | 4,277 |
| VPN Consumer Network (hosting) | AS212238 | 22 | 3,712 |
| TC DATACENTER LIMITED (hosting) | AS218785 | 15 | 29,187 |
| Bandito Networks, Inc (hosting) | AS206092 | 14 | 1,621 |
| LogicWeb Inc (hosting) | AS62240 | 14 | 1,619 |
| M247 Ltd Paris (hosting) | AS9009 | 12 | 374 |
| FOP Danik Vyacheslav Evgenievich (hosting) | AS219502 | 9 | 2,035 |
| FranTech Solutions (hosting) | AS14956 | 8 | 1,979 |
Top scanning infrastructures
| IP | Country | Organisation | Requests | Days | EDR | Looking for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
35.205.88.64 | Belgium | Google Cloud (europe-west1) | 23,850 | 6 | blocked | .env / credentials probe, Config/backup probe, .git repo leak |
93.123.109.101 | Andorra | Techoff SRV Limited | 10,899 | 6 | blocked | .env / credentials probe, Config/backup probe, .git repo leak |
213.209.159.133 | Germany | Feo Prest SRL | 14,841 | 6 | blocked | .env / credentials probe, .git repo leak, Config/backup probe |
136.70.248.214 | United States | Google Cloud (us-east4) | 15,783 | 5 | blocked | .env / credentials probe, CVE-2025-30208, Config/backup probe |
127.0.0.1 | — | — | 2,984 | 3 | 149 probes | .git repo leak, Login/XML-RPC/REST abuse, .env / credentials probe |
136.70.197.155 | United States | Google Cloud (us-east4) | 18,191 | 4 | blocked | .env / credentials probe, CVE-2025-30208, Path traversal / file read |
20.196.195.74 | South Korea | Microsoft Azure Cloud (koreacentral) | 4,863 | 4 | blocked | Login/XML-RPC/REST abuse, Plugin vuln scan |
2a06:98c0:3600::103 | United States | Cloudflare, Inc. | 29,998 | 7 | 1 probes | Install takeover probe, .env / credentials probe, .git repo leak |
20.204.110.107 | India | Microsoft Azure Cloud (centralindia) | 963 | 5 | blocked | Plugin vuln scan |
136.70.165.55 | United States | Google Cloud (us-east4) | 3,661 | 3 | blocked | .env / credentials probe, CVE-2025-30208, Config/backup probe |
34.156.206.32 | Belgium | Google Cloud (europe-west1) | 27,542 | 4 | blocked | .env / credentials probe, Config/backup probe, .git repo leak |
34.80.89.28 | Taiwan | Google Cloud (asia-east1) | 4,395 | 2 | blocked | .env / credentials probe, .git repo leak, Config/backup probe |
Source: SyX-RAY EDR agents, aggregated across protected infrastructure. Target hostnames are never published. IP geolocation is approximate.
Frequently asked questions
Why is active vulnerability scanning a concern for organizations?
Active vulnerability scanning is concerning because it allows attackers to identify potential weaknesses in a network that can be exploited, leading to severe security breaches.
What steps can organizations take to protect themselves from these threats?
Organizations should implement robust security systems, conduct regular vulnerability assessments, and invest in employee cybersecurity training.
Are there specific vulnerabilities that are commonly targeted?
Yes, vulnerabilities associated with widely used software and systems, such as CVE-2022-12345 and CVE-2023-45678, are often targeted during these scans.




Comments
Loading comments...
Leave a Comment